On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:08:38 +0530 (IST)
sunil saraff <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hello,
>  
> I have two vlan’s configured on my switch port i.e 246 & 247. 247 is a tagged 
> vlan and 246 is the untagged vlan(native vlan).When I create a virtual vlan 
> interface with tagged vlan 247 using vconfig(eth0.247) it works fine. If I 
> create a virtual vlan interface with untagged vlan 246 using 
> vconfig(eth0.246) I see a different behaviour.
>  
> My configuration
>  
> Ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
> Vconfig add eth0 246
> Ifconfig eth0.246 192.168.246.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> Route add default gw 192.168.246.1
>  
>  
> The packet that goes out from the linux box is tagged with 246 vlan but the 
> replies are untagged(as it is the native vlan). So these untagged packets are 
> not accepted by linux box. So, can you suggest me a way in which I can 
> configure my linux box so that the untagged packets for default vlan are 
> accepted?Can bridging be done on eth0(untagged interface) and eth0.246(tagged 
> interface)?
>  
> Thanks,
> Sunil 

This is not a bridging question, it is a vlan question.
So post it to [email protected]

I don't see 247 anywhere in your config? 

P.s: the ifconfig/vconfig/route commands are old. Use ip command instead.
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

Reply via email to