Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>
> Maybe. :)
>
> If it applies, I see no reason why it shouldn't.
I did experience some really wierd things when trying out Bridge NAT on
some of the 2.4.10-preX releases in UML, but I don't know if it was UML,
2.4.10-preX or the bridge patches to blaim there. What I did see is that
it seemed to be related to the neighbour cache. If the cache was
populated then everything worked fine, if it wasn't then very odd things
happened on bridge-NAT:ed traffic. Haven't yet had time to upgrade my
UML test installation to 2.4.10 to see if the problem is still there.
Regards
Henrik Nordstr�m
MARA Systems AB
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
