Hi!
>>Well... BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO says to create a chains with
>>the bridge's name. I've done it with iptables but it doesn't work.
>>
>>So, I created rules using FORWARD chain.. And it worked!!!
>>Looks like bridge code is using this chain.... Please try this issue.
>>
>>I think Lennert Buytenhenk can answer it....
>>
>>bests regards
>>
>
> This "issue" has turned up quite some times on this list. For the 2.4.x
> kernels you use the bridge-nf patch and this patch does _not_ need a
> specially created chain with the bridge's name. You can use all 5 built in
> chains of iptables now!
> This is a Good Thing (TM).
>
Sorry... it was my first day as a mailing list subscriber :-) I didn't
read the archives....
Well.. by the way.. I just managed to use bridge firewalling using
FORWARD chain. Do you think it's a rule "issue" ?? :-)
thanks
bests regards
--
Lucas Brasilino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.recife.pe.gov.br
Emprel - Empresa Municipal de Informatica (pt_BR)
Recife's IT City Hall Company (en_US)
Recife - Pernambuco - Brasil
Fone: +55-81-34167078
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge
