David Sean Taylor wrote: > Shinsuke SUGAYA wrote: >>>Or is it meant to be another, co-existing solution? >> >> >>I think I can say yes. >>My suggestion is for MyFaces. >>MyFaces has some extended components(called Tomahawk). >>These components do not work on J2(JS2-316). So, if >>using this MyFaces bridge, they works :) >> >>I summarized as below: >> >>If user want to use only JSF standard components.. >> -> use JSF bridge >>If user want to use JSF standard components and Tomahawk.. >> -> use my suggestion >> > > Sorry, I let this one slip. > I think you should check it in and we can test it out.
I have submitted the patch to MyFaces team(MYFACES-434). But, since there is the dependency issue, Stan who is a committer for MyFaces is working on it right now. If we cannot integrate it to MyFaces, I think that I'll do that to Portals Bridges. Thanks, shinsuke __________________________________ Save the earth http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
