> > > Now your above statement is specifically about the environment. I
> > > can understand the point you make, for example how some states may
> produce
> > > acid rain forming clouds but the actual acid rain falls over a
> different
> > > state, or Canada. But do you have specific cases in mind that
> illustrates
> > > your point?
> >
> > Texas is one of the US's main sources of pollution, but we have as yet
> been
> > unsuccessful in producing acid rain only over Canada, although Wisconson
> and
> > the Dakotas are now fairly wasted.
> > Last I heard, a certain large eared Texas billionaire was planning to
> buy
> up
> > all those California windmills, mount them on immense oil derricks in
> > Kansas, and use them as fans to help transport the gulf coasts most
> > plentiful industrial byproduct to our deserving NAFTA partners.
> > With any luck, everything from Toronto to Newfoundland will have that
> > British industrial look in just a few years.
> >
> > <G>
> > xponent
> > rob
> > <G>
>
What, you didn't know Perot was crazy?
Kevin
