Full Disclosure: The following message was sent to me by the Bush Campaign.  
Nevertheless, unlike previous messages, most of it is not propoganda.  Included is the 
text of Baker's statement today, in which he is opposing the hand recount.  Also 
included are links to the Palm Beach Post, NY Times, and Washington Post in which 
further legal challenges and a revote are opposed.

3 

Palm Beach Post Capital Bureau 
NORTH FLORIDA COUNTY TRIES TO FILL IN BLANKS ON BALLOTS
http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbpost/epaper/editions/today/news_16.html 

Palm Beach News 
SUPPORTERS: BUCHANAN NUMBERS POSSIBLE
http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbdailynews/11/1110buchanan.html 

_________________________________________________________________

5 
NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, OTHERS: REVOTE OR COURT REMEDY
POLITICALLY UNSOUND AND LEGALLY QUESTIONABLE

"The problem is that potential remedies, such as a new election 
in Palm Beach County, seem politically unsound and legally 
questionable. The sad reality is that ballot disputes and 
imperfections are a feature of every election. It will poison 
the political atmosphere if presidential elections, in 
particular, come to be seen as merely a starting point for 
litigation." 
- New York Times, Editorial, 11/10/00 
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/10/opinion/10FRI1.html 


"We say yes to counting a little more, but the legal action 
about which Mr. Daley spoke elliptically should be approached 
with enormous caution and restraint. Absent more than is 
currently known, our sense is that either a lawsuit or a repeat 
vote would raise at least as many questions as it would likely 
resolve; the courts in the end can't legitimize the results." 
- Washington Post, Editorial, 11/10/00 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57302-2000Nov9.html 


"Some folks are even calling for a rerun of the Florida 
election.  It is important to decide this election by the rules 
that 100 million Americans understood -- or should have 
understood -- when they entered the voting booth Tuesday.  This 
is not just about fair play for Al Gore and George W. Bush. It 
is about defending a system that regards voting-day verdicts as 
the final word, a concept that distinguishes this nation from 
most others in the world." 
- San Francisco Chronicle, Editorial, 11/9/00 


"'You know, I don't think the ballot was a problem, Bill and 
I'll tell you why-is that there's one section I don't know if 
people are really looking at, which relates to electronic or 
electromechanical voting.  And in that particular case, what 
the law says down here, it says 'Voting squares may be placed 
in front of or in back of the names of candidates and 
statements.'" 
- CNN's "Crossfire," Greta Van Susteren,  11/09/00 


"If you start saying the ballot should be thrown out because 
of confusion, I think that cases like that could be brought all 
over the country." 
- CNN's Larry King Live, Bill Schneider, 11/8/00 

_________________________________________________________________

1 
STATEMENT FROM SECRETARY JAMES A. BAKER III

The American people voted on November 7.  Governor George W. 
Bush won 31 states with a total of 271 electoral votes.  The 
vote in Florida was very close, but when it was counted, 
Governor Bush was the winner.   

Now, three days later, the vote in Florida has been recounted.   
Over two-thirds of the state election supervisors overseeing 
the recount are Democrats. 

At the end of this recount, Governor Bush is still the winner, 
subject only to counting the overseas ballots, which have 
traditionally favored the Republican candidate.  No evidence of 
vote fraud either in the original vote or in the recount has 
been presented. 

Now the Gore campaign is calling for yet another recount in 
selective and predominantly Democratic counties where there 
were unexplained large vote swings in their favor in the 
recount. 

It appears that the Gore campaign is attempting to unduly 
prolong the country's national Presidential election through 
endless challenges to the results of the vote here in Florida. 

Furthermore, the more often ballots are recounted, especially 
by hand, the more likely it is that human errors, like lost 
ballots, and other risks, will be introduced.  This frustrates 
the very reason why we have moved from hand counting to 
machine counting. 

Let me say a word specifically about the Palm Beach ballot.   
There is a rule of law to be followed for elections.  The state 
of Florida has established legal procedures to design, approve, 
publish and, if need be, to protest ballots before the election.   
The ballot was designed by a Democratic elections supervisor.   
She approved it.  The Democratic Party did not question it 
before the election.  This "butterfly"-type ballot was used in 
recent elections in the same county under the same rules.  Again, 
the Democrats did not complain.  The overwhelming majority of 
voters who used the ballot understood it and cast valid votes.   
Our lawyers have confirmed the legality of this ballot, and we 
have copies of the relevant Florida statute available for you 
to see. 

The Gore campaign has also tried to make a lot of the fact that 
double marked ballots are not counted.  A key principle in 
America is one person, one vote.  If we have ballots with two 
votes, of course we cannot count them or guess about them.   
Ballots that are double-marked can't be evidence of the voter's 
intent to vote one way or another.  No jurisdiction in the 
United States would accept such a ballot as a valid vote, and 
Florida law specifically does not.  It happens in every 
precinct in every election.  And the procedure is clear:  These 
ballots must be disregarded. 

We understand, and I understand personally, that it is 
frustrating to lose by a narrow margin.  But it happens.  It 
happened to the Republican Presidential candidates in 1960 and 
1976.  Both Vice President Nixon and President Ford put the 
country's interest first.  They accepted the vote for the good 
of the country. 

It is important that there be some finality to the election 
process.  What if we insisted on recounts in other states that 
are very close?  For example, in Wisconsin, Iowa, (and if we 
don't win) New Mexico.   

Let the country step back a moment, pause, and think about 
what's at stake.  This may be the last chance.  There is no 
reasonable end to this process if it slips away. 

The purpose of our national election is to establish a 
"Constitutional government," not unending legal wrangling.  We 
will therefore vigorously oppose the Gore campaign's efforts to 
keep recounting until it likes the result.  For the good of the 
country and the sake of our standing in the world, the 
campaigning should end, and the business of an orderly 
transition should begin. 

_________________________________________________________________



John D. Giorgis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
________________________________________________________________
To get your free Web-based E-mail go to http://www.nandomail.com

Reply via email to