But what about the senate? Yes, your vote had the same selective power as any other vote for the senator in that state, but when your senator votes he/she is voting for or against an issue with power that is irrespective of population and totally determined by arbitrary lines on a map. The vote of a senator from Alaska has the same power as the vote of a senator from California, even though they represent a vastly different number of people. Isn't that another example? The Senate is the thing that protects the interests of the states. We don't need the electoral college precisely because the way elect senators insures that the small population states are given additional leverage. Joshua (Holding up his Canadian card; he only knows US politics from television.) >>
- RE: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Joshua Bell
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All dendriite
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes ... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Joshua Bell
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes ... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes ... dendriite
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Ta... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Tarr, Kevin
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Bemmzim
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Bemmzim
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Bemmzim
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Bemmzim
- Re: Proportional Representation Re: Winner Takes All Bemmzim
