Darryl,
I replied to an earier mail regarding my thoughts on why BB is wrong. I
suggest that you could examine the facts for yourself. by you not being
exposed to any other model except BB, goes with my belief that there is too
much 'faith' that BB is right, which has permeated into cultural influence.
Why look elsewhere if BB fits in with the modern cosmologic idea that the
Universe spontaneously "bloomed" into existence?
I questioned that belief, and found evidence that BB may not be true. The
danger it that it opposes what most people believe, I may be mistaken and
proven a fool, and I may not be objective in valuating BB as a sound theory.
I also do not have a good alternate model to offer in lieu of BB. This
places me in shaky position to be judged as being guilty of employing faulty
logic (i.e.: I don't know any better) or, I am merely trying to influence
everyone for my benefit or advantage. Either way I am judged, I will be
"demonized". Don't let that stop you from doing some investigation. I would
be gracious if you could critically point out my flaws in thinking (as much
as I would hate it ;->).
The simple logic you talk about below should be questioned. The question to
ask oneself, is, does it appear simply logical because it fits my
cosmological view, or is it simply logical based on the evidence. I can't
answer that for you or anyone, but I do believe that any cosmologic view
does influence empirical judgment, which makes finding good answers that
much harder.
Nerd From Hell
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darryl Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 10:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Big Bang
>
>
> Chad: Perhaps you could describe to us what observations you feel
> contradict the big bang. I am not a physicist, but I haven't heard of
> any. It seems to me that our observation that the universe is
> expanding contradicts a steady state model, as well as a contracting
> universe. If the universe was at one time steady, how could it become
> expanding? The only way for it to be expanding now is for that energy
> to have been given to it at the beginning of the universe.
> So it would
> have to have been at one point when the universe began.
>
> This seems to me to be simple logic based on our observations. What's
> wrong with this picture?
>
> =====
>
>
>
> Darryl
>
> Think Galactically -- Act Terrestrially
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
