"Kristin A. Ruhle" wrote:
> ..well not so much the Internet or telcos but television, cable television
> and radio broadcasting
> 
> DISNEY IS EVIL!!!!
        <snicker> then you would love reading
http://www.public.asu.edu/~dkarjala/publicdomain/Vanpelt-s99.html 

> Disney is again attempting to bully cable systems into
> carrying their extra channels "or your can't have ABC!" The people hurt in
> these battles are the CONSUMERS.
        but, golly, they get all those 'extra' channels! think of all that
freedom of choice (for a reasonable price, after all Mr. Eisner does
need pocket money.)

> Media companies create dangerous
> concentrations of power by acquiring ech other and they HOLD THE CONSUMER
> HOSTAGE! 
        <image of Disney thugs breaking down doors at 3 am....>

> IF you live in PHiladelphia or Chicago, how about holding a
> bonfire of DIsney merchandise in protest against the EVIL MOUSE EMPIRE?!!!
        but - see above link - The Mouse may not even be theirs....
 
> Disney should be foreced to divest itself of ABC. This would prevent them
> from using it as a bargaining chip and cluttering up cable dials with
> channels people may not want! (Not only Disney Channel.)
        that might be a useful interim approach. in the long run i would
want to work for a law (or result) that owning the pipes does not
provide control over what goes through the pipes - and that you can
only be obligated to pay for what is actually 'used'. 
 
> And while we are at it, bring back the rules against one corporation
> owning too many radio stations!
        there are a number of ways that 'too many' could be defined - and a
variety of benefits/drawbacks to each definition. certainly a lot of
community input is needed into defining 'too many'.....

> ANybody notice how they all sound the same?
        i wouldn't say they all sound the same, but the styles available in
a particular market do tend to be limited to variations of A, B, C,
or D..... and the public interest is a lot broader than that - even
if your goal is 'market share'.

        cheers,
        christopher

-- 
Christopher Gwyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to