At 01:06 AM 1/25/01 EST, dolphin wrote:
>>>>
I call that a vote well spent, especially because those
things might not have happened if Al Gore were elected.
<<<<

I personally consider it a sign that the Democrats still consider strong-environmentalism as unelectable, which is why they have to save their most radical environmental proposals for the least politically sensitive time - lame duck time. We'll see if it changes their behaviour in the future, but I would not bet on it.

>>>>
In four years, the
democrats will more than likely have the presidency again (no president who
won the electoral college, but lost the popular vote has ever won in the
reelection campaign),
<<<<

You can feel free to go right on believing that - but if you think that John Quincy Adams or Hayes has anything to do with the year 2004 election, you are deluding yourself. Hayes for example didn't even run for re-election, which reduces your sample to 1.

Additionally, I can't verify this, but I believe that Thomas Jefferson lost the popular vote and went on to be re-elected - but such things were hard to measure in 1800.

JDG


__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today:
to make our country more just and generous; to affirm the dignity of
our lives and every life." - George W. Bush Inaugural Address 1/20/01

Reply via email to