--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Joshua Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently dug up this link: > > http://www.btinternet.com/~d.p.rowbottom/qmrealism.htm > >Dan, what's your take on what the author has to say? > >(I'm only part way through reading it now, so I can't offer much. Of >course, I'm not sure I'll be able to offer anything to say about it >when I'm done, so it's kinda moot.) I scanned it, but didn't read it fully. My first impression is that it was written by someone who's on the edge of understanding what is going on. I wrote the author, and found its not a dissertation in the classical sense: it was not written in partial fulfullment for a Phd. I also found that he didn't understand that Bohm required backwards in time signals. (The other alternative is a hidden preferred reference frame.) That lowered my estimation of his understanding to what it is now. Dan'm Traeki Ring of Crystallized Knowledge. Known for calculating, but not known for shutting up
