Dan Minette wrote: > > Well, you added stuff to locality. Strictly speaking, > locality can be defined as "there can exist no spacelike > signals". If two events are spacelike, there will always > be a reference frame in which they are simultaneous, one > in which A is before B, and one in which B is before A. > Is this valid for all spacelike events? Or is it valid only locally? Or is my question stupid O:-) ? Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Kant, QM Richard Baker
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Kant, QM Richard Baker
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Kant, QM, Realism Marvin Long, Jr.
- an aside Re: Kant, QM, Realism Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Kant, QM Bemmzim
- Re: Kant, QM Erik Reuter
- Re: Kant, QM Bemmzim
- Re: Kant, QM Julia Thompson
