On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2/22/01 8:14:24 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > >
> > > Your question is simultaneously stupid an profound (or is it profound
> > > and stupid).
> >
> > I believe that is relative and depends on the reference frame of the
> > observer.
> >
> >
>
> Well aren't we special
Either that or temporal.
<dodge>
Julia
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Kant, QM Richard Baker
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Kant, QM Richard Baker
- Re: Kant, QM Alberto Monteiro
- Kant, QM, Realism Marvin Long, Jr.
- an aside Re: Kant, QM, Realism Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Kant, QM Bemmzim
- Re: Kant, QM Erik Reuter
- Re: Kant, QM Bemmzim
- Re: Kant, QM Julia Thompson
- Re: Kant, QM Dan Minette
- Re: Kant, QM William T Goodall
- Re: Kant, QM Bemmzim
