"John D. Giorgis" wrote: > Now that I am completely bamboozled, let me try and clear things up with > some simple "Yes/No" questions. Please answer with a "Yes/No", and then > explain your answer if you wish. > Let me restate, for clarity, and apologize for being unclear in the first place. The act of declaring ones self morally superior is, in and of itself, a moral flaw (IMO). Thus one who proclaims themselves to be morally superior is, in an absolute sense, not morally superior. What I didn't mean is that by declaring myself morally superior to someone, I am automatically morally inferior to that person. Hope that that unbamboozles you, and again, sorry for not being more clear. Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Doug Pensinger
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Brian Giles
- Re: Moral Superiority Doug Pensinger
- Re: Moral Superiority John D. Giorgis
- Re: Moral Superiority Doug Pensinger
- Re: Moral Superiority John D. Giorgis
- Re: Moral Superiority Julia Thompson
- Re: Moral Superiority Doug Pensinger
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Doug Pensinger
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Brian Giles
- Re: Moral Superiority Re: Russi... Julia Thompson
- Re: Russians Christopher Gwyn
- Re: Russians John D. Giorgis
- Re: Russians Christopher Gwyn
- Re: Russians John D. Giorgis
- Re: Russians Bemmzim
- Re: Russians Bemmzim
- Ethical Dilemmas Re: Russians John D. Giorgis
