At 07:17 PM 4/4/01 -0500, Marvin Long wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Darryl Shannon wrote:
>
> >
> > The only reasonable choice is to accept both logic and free will. Kind
> > of my own personal version of Pascal's wager.
> >
>
>I think it's more reasonable to accept that free will and logic are
>conceptual tools that are sometimes useful, sometimes not. I'll agree
>that arguments of theistic freedom vs. Newtonian determinism don't very
>far to go, though, if neither side wants to budge.
Maybe it's like wave-particle duality. Sometimes it looks like you have
free will, sometimes it doesn't . . .
;-)
-- Ronn! :)
