> At 08:22 PM 5/22/01 +0300, you wrote:
>
> > > Well, here's a lovely return to 1930's Germany.
> > >
> > > http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2001/05/22/taliban/index.html
> > >
> > > Seems that the Muslim majority party in Afghanistan is going
> to require
> > > label on the clothing of Hindus, identifying themselves as
> such. Sound
> > > familiar?
> > >
> > > Jim
> > > "What can change the nature of a man?" - The Nameless One
> >
> >Interestingly, it's also been said (by the BBC reporter who was
> there) that
> >this may be to exempt Hindus and Sikhs from the strictest
> interpretation of
> >muslim law.
> >
> >Charlie
>
>
> Un-huh.
>
> And if anyone truly believes that making members of a minority group wear
> labels identifying themselves as such is actually intended for their
> benefit, I know where there's a bridge for sale . . .
>
>
> -- Ronn! :)
I meant interesting that anyone would think that it's at all likely that
it's for their benefit...
Charlie
