Andrea Leistra wrote:
>
>Explain, then, if you will, why the new policy also requires Hindu
>women to go veiled, something directly contrary to the "protecting
>minorities from strict Islamic law" interpretation. The Taliban *say*,
>according to the NYT, that it's a protection-of-minorities issue,
>but anyone who believes that needs their head examined.
>
Even though I find forcing women to cover their whole body an
atrocity, there is a point in enforcing those horrible veils into
every women. To make an analogy, imagine that some
brazilian native girls are visiting your University. Would you
accept them to be wearing their typical costumes?
Alberto Monteiro
