> I didn't know what you meant by the MG BGT, I thought maybe it was a new
car
> they were showing. Then I saw the driver's list. I don't know what's more
> shocking: racing a 67 MG BGT or that a 68 Datsun 510 was faster?!?
>
> Kevin Tarr
> Trump high, lead low
>
> Why are either shocking? Don't forget that for a while, the dominant force
> in world rallying was the humble Mini, and there's still a Mini only
> rally-cross series in the UK (called MiniCross, natch!) that is quite
> possibly the cheaper racing series in the world to compete in... (Well, a
> full race-spec car can be obtained for around �700...) :o)
>
> As for the little question mark in your previous post about the Subaru
World
> Rally Team coming from England, yes, it would do. The SWRT is run by
> prodrive, based in Banbury, Oxfordshire. They've been preparing Subaru
cars
> since Colin McRae was driving a Legacy Turbo rally car...
>
> Charlie
> who wishes to politely remind Kevin that HTML posts are unmutual...
Time for this slack jawed American to show his ignorance. What do you mean
unmutual? Did you mean you wanted the website?
http://www.scca.org/amateur/performance_rally/prorally/2001/stpr/entry.html
My statements about the cars meant I thought that MGs are worth too much to
race them* and that a 510 could only produce a good speed when dropped out
of an airplane. The 510 didn't become the 240 did it? And if it did then it
would be worth too much to race.
Kevin Tarr
Trump high, lead low
* I know amateurs race expensive cars all the time, and the MG isn't really
that expensive. It's not like it's a Ferrari racing through the trees.