At 06:57 AM 6/11/01, Rich wrote: >John said: > > > P.S. Do you really want to use the likelihood of an object to kill > > somebody as the standard by which we justify government regulations? > >Isn't that entirely sensible? Or do you propose government regulation of >everything so, perhaps, there should be a seven day waiting period on >ownership of bananas? Or total deregulation, in which case I look >forward to owning a supernova trigger because, you know, that'd be >kinda cool. Since alcohol is implicated in half of traffic fatalities and a significant number of acts of violence, how much regulation do you think should be put on its availability and use? -- Ronn! :)
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Bemmzim
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr John D. Giorgis
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Dan Minette
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Charlie Bell
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr John D. Giorgis
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Richard Baker
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr William T Goodall
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
