In a message dated 6/11/01 4:47:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << At the very least, I should hope that you will be far less cavalier about your little example in the future? >> Why? Are you ever going to present something resembling an argument, or are you just going to keep insisting that I'm wrong, wrong, wrong? Replying to the only point you've made so far, I concede that knives can be used to kill people and even, on occasion, to kill more than one person. Is this supposed to come as a shock to us? When you can prove that knives are as effective in killing large numbers of peple as firearms, we'll talk again. Patrick Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr John D. Giorgis
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Richard Baker
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr William T Goodall
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Horn, John
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Dan Minette
- Re: Science has a new Martyr William T Goodall
- Re: Science has a new Martyr (and a new... dean
- Re: Science has a new Martyr (and ... Dan Minette
- gun control (newbie) Dean Forster
