DEAN WROTE:
> Well Dan, it looks like you've got the courts and the
> gun control advocates behind you and i've got
> everybody else. Your interpretation is incorrect to
> anyone you'd care to ask who studies the constitution
> and the bill of rights impartially - the judiciary
> would seem to be an exception, why is this? The only
> resolution is to do as Cecil suggested, try and repeal
> the 2nd amendment. Anything else is underhanded
> political maneuvering.
Not just "the courts" but the Supreme Court, the group that makes the final
pronouncements on whether laws are Constitutional or not. If you're basing
your argument upon the Constitution (which is what the title of this post
indicates), you've *got* to take into account the opinions of the Supreme
Court. Anything else is just willful ignorance.
Also, could you back up with figures that you've got "everybody else" behind
you? ;-)
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 32384792
