"Kristin A. Ruhle" wrote: > > What I object to is that it is the very best and brightest in a company > (nhot the secretary type "stuipd end users") who need to be so MANAGED and > CONTROLLED. It is like you were in nursery school. If I get job offerfs I > think will will want to read the company's usage policy (usage policies > are normal i know) before accepting. anyone bright enough to be offeneded > can probably go off and work independently, consult or what not, because > the most skiled and valuable, why should they have to submjit to an > organization with a lot of nasty rules?!!!!!?? *nod* exactly IBM made news a few years ago when *gasp* they started an internat "start-up" company where people *double gasp* didn't have to wear suits. -j-
- Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Angry enough to spit Dan Minette
- Re: Angry enough to spit Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Angry enough to spit Michael Harney
- Re: Angry enough to spit J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Angry enough to spit Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: Angry enough to spit Dan Minette
- Re: Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Angry enough to spit Russell Chapman
- Re: Angry enough to spit Andrew Crystall
- Re: Angry enough to spit Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Angry enough to spit Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Angry enough to spit Julia Thompson
