> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Marc Erickson wrote: > > > The list may > > contain political discussions, but it is not a Repulican rally.) > > > > What she said > > Thank you Kirsten > > At the risk of dissenting...NOT. If John wants to broadcast his political > illusions, why should we want to stop him? ;-) > > More seriously, is anyone here so ideologically rabid that he or she is > simply incapable of *ignoring* a .sig with which he or she happens to > disagree? If one is rabid in this particular way, then maybe one should > consider that the problem is with one's own rabid self, and not with the > .sig's owner? > well, I just don't think it's appropriate to have overlty political .sigs (like camapign buanners) on posts that are say, trading recpies for cookies, or telling each other jokes, or swapping new born baby stories. (The new moms on the list...how awful they come home to a list that has turned mean...maybe we could rename it BABY-L: and allow only postes related to children for one month?) Kristin and yeah, I'd apply that equally to a sig like "MEAT IS MURDER!" from a vegetarian, or "BOYCOTT xx" or other things the left is into .... i can admire other sincerity but my hands aren't exactly clean and I have enough guilt feelings without some holier than thou leftist...well you get it.
