At 10:09 PM 7/16/01, you wrote:
>--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "K.Feete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My position has been to at least try to listen to both sides and hope
>> <sigh> for cold fusion....
>
>If you are talking about Ponds
That's "Pons", actually . . .
>-Fleischmann type cold fusion instead of muon catalyst cold fusion, then I
>think you have only a slightly better chance of having your hopes
>fulfilled than having our power problems solved by a perpetual motion
>machine of the second kind.
>
>If you are talking about muon catalyst, then it is theoretically possible,
>but devilishly tricky.
>
>Dan M.
Except that no one has figured out how get more energy from the fusion
reactions that muon can catalyze during its lifetime of a couple of hundred
nanoseconds or so than it takes to create the muon in the first place . . .
-- Ronn! :)
