At 09:23 AM 7/19/01, you wrote:
> > >
> > >If you are talking about muon catalyst, then it is theoretically
>possible,
> > >but devilishly tricky.
> > >
> > >Dan M.
> >
> >
> > Except that no one has figured out how get more energy from the fusion
> > reactions that muon can catalyze during its lifetime of a couple of
>hundred
> > nanoseconds or so than it takes to create the muon in the first place . .
>.
> >
>
>Right. On paper it can be done. The other can't even be done on paper.
>I'm not holding my breath for it, I rate it as a low probability, but still
>orders of magnitude above cold fusion in a jar.
>
>Dan M.
BTW, I went to grad school in the physics dep't at BYU back in the
early-mid 80s and was still living in Provo in the spring of 1989, so I was
somewhat of a firsthand witness to the spectacle (or debacle) of "cold
fusion" . . .
-- Ronn! :)
