Alberto Monteiro wrote:

> The use of sign language for people with Down Syndrome is
> *very* controversial. I've watched the flame wars in the
> DS List, that make any Economics debate in this list look
> like a bunch of nuns discussing the next meal :-)

You give the impression that some contributors don't just think it won't
work, but that it is somehow negative or harmful (one assumes if they just
didn't believe in it, they wouldn't flame those who did).
If they oppose it, what is their concern?

Russell Chapman
Brisbane Australia


Reply via email to