At 05:53 15-8-01 -0500, Adam Lipscomb wrote:
> > That's crap, Gautum. Provide links to websites that defend the US on this
> > matter, and I'll go over them with the same comb I use for sites that
> > criticize the US.
>
>Must be a pretty gap-toothed comb. I'm seeing the same thing as Gautam from
>where I'm sitting, and I'm normally inclined to disagree with him.
At 21:49 15-8-01 -0400, Bob Zimmerman wrote:
>Seems to me you go over the anti-US web sites with a magnet not a comb. If it
>is there you stick to it.
My first thought was "I'm not even going to dignify that nonsense with a
response".
My second thought was "hm, on second thought..."
You see, I have gotten similar ideas about a few people on this list: every
site that supports their views is considered "credible" without as much as
a hint of any possible doubt. Yet every site that is quoted that disagrees
with you (plural) is immediately labeled "not credible", even after it is
pointed out that they *are* credible.
It often seems that these people can't accept anything that disagrees with
their views.
And then you say *I* use a "gap-toothed comb", or "a magnet not a comb".
Sheesh.
Jeroen
_________________________________________________________________________
Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://go.to/brin-l
