In a message dated 8/16/01 1:56:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
>Seems to me you go over the anti-US web sites with a magnet not a comb. If
it
>is there you stick to it.
My first thought was "I'm not even going to dignify that nonsense with a
response".
My second thought was "hm, on second thought..."
You see, I have gotten similar ideas about a few people on this list: every
site that supports their views is considered "credible" without as much as
a hint of any possible doubt. Yet every site that is quoted that disagrees
with you (plural) is immediately labeled "not credible", even after it is
pointed out that they *are* credible.
It often seems that these people can't accept anything that disagrees with
their views.
>>
My point was that you never seem to accept or quote anything that varies from
your world view. It seems to me you choose sites that will confirm this view
and accept things uncritically while at the same time you find no merit in
statements, facts or arguements that run counter to your world view. And that
world view includes as strong component the notion that every thing the US
does is horrible and immoral illegal etc. You actually blamed the US for
North Korea's horrible treatment of its own people. Give me a break.
