At 11:59 AM 9/3/01 +0200 Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM wrote:
>Something similar has been bugging me for several years now. How can a
>scientist believe in the existance of a God? Any good scientist holds that a
>statement is only true when there is scientific evidence to prove it. Yet,
>scientists like Dan also believe in the existance of God, even though there
>is no scientific evidence to prove that God exists.
>
>So, how can a scientist believe in God when he is trained to only accept
>that what is scientifically proven?
Unless, of course, said scientist has evidence, but simply can't publish it
in a journal.
Additionally, there are different levels of "proof." I think that there
is an awful lot of evidence to make Christianity a very reasonable
proposition. I can see why others disagree - but it does nto strike me as
unusual that different scientistis disagree on different propositions.
JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
We are products of the same history, reaching from Jerusalem and
Athens to Warsaw and Washington. We share more than an alliance.
We share a civilization. - George W. Bush, Warsaw, 06/15/01
