On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:46:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/3/01 5:27:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << But assigning fault and blame is not likely to accomplish much. I prefer > > to discuss possible actions to take. As far as finding a solution, I > > think Israel is in a much stronger position than Palestine. They are > > richer and much more powerful. Israel is not realistically in any danger > > of being displaced, not with their military might and the full might > > of the US behind them. They were in danger in the past, but Israel > > demonstrated in 1947-48, and again, decisively in 1967, that they are > > the force to be reckoned with in the region. >>
You messed up the attribution. I wrote that, not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > See if you follow and agree with my line of reasoning here: I don't really follow, no. Especially not this part > You may disagree with their tactics, and you may disagree with the > killing of innocents but you should not fault them for acting to > preserve themselves. I specifically said I did not want to discuss or assign fault, but rather was discussing actions that could be taken to bring about peace. Are you suggesting that the current situation, if it continues without significant change, is likely to lead to peace? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
