Streaming media is usually sent with UDP packets, which are not
acknowledged, so although there's an initial TCP handshake, the stream
itself is essentially one-way.  The choppiness you are hearing is probably a
bottleneck at your ISP.

Although I used to work with the inventors of multicasting and the MBone, I
don't know much about widely it is supported today by ISPs.  For it to work,
it has to be supported in every router between you and the source.

Since I switched to a fairly awesome ISP (conxion.com), I experience
virtually no problems with streaming data -- and I almost always have
something playing while I work.

See http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/techresources/streaming/multiwp.asp
for a decent overview.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:03 AM
> To: Brin-L
> Subject: New irregulars computer question
>
>
> This is more a discussion point, not a question I expect anyone to
> solidly answer. I listen to streaming audio at home with cable modem and
> work with T1. It used to be solid but lately the stream is very choppy.
> I listen to different sources so I don't think it's because of the
> supplier. (Though when Excite when out it did make some sources
> disappear.)
>
> Anyway from what I understand the streaming audio is still a 'handshake'
> between your computer and the streaming site. I know how information is
> sent, packets et al. Is anyone thinking of a different way for audio and
> video to be broadcast? I know a site can't just be 'leaking' packets
> onto the internet like an antenna sends it's signals, but there should
> be some way for user to get the packets without any load on the sender.
> Is anyone working on this?
>
> Kevin T.
> (I got blistering e-mail from brother who is mad about Art Bell charging
> $25USD for six month subscription. Another unnamed radio source said it
> costs them one million to stream the audio, so they were ending the
> service. This same company had close to 250 million profit.)
>

Reply via email to