John Garcia wrote: > If Al Queda does not follow the Geneva Convention, if it does not adhere > to the laws of armed conflict, why should its members be accorded the > Convention's protections? > Because _we do_ follow the Geneva Convention. They aren't civilized so we don't have to treat them in a civilized manner? Please note that I'm not contending that there have been rights violations, only that as a matter of principal we should adhere to the moral high ground despite the despicable acts that have been committed against us. -- Doug email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zo.com/~brighto Irreverence is the champion of liberty. Mark Twain - Notebook, 1888
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Traged... Dan Minette
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tr... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE... Dan Minette
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tragedy in ... Dan Minette
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tragedy in ... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tragedy in ... Richard S. Crawford
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Traged... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Traged... J. van Baardwijk
- RE: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tr... Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE: Tr... John Garcia
- RE: Treatment Of Prisoners (was RE... Doug
- RE: Treatment Of Prisoners (wa... Gautam Mukunda
- RE: Treatment Of Prisoner... J. van Baardwijk
- RE: Treatment Of Pris... John D. Giorgis
- Critisism and acid re... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Critisism and aci... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Critisism and aci... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Critisism and aci... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Treatment Of Pris... Gautam Mukunda
- Rhetoric of debate (w... Nick Arnett
- Re: Rhetoric of debat... Doug
