Gautam Mukunda wrote: > > Not to get into the argument, but I actually think that Woodrow > Wilson was the second-worst President in American history, > after only the pathetic James Buchanan... > Really. How do you justify that? I would think that despite the fact that he was a bigot that he would at least rank near the middle of the pack. -- Doug email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zo.com/~brighto "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration." A. Lincoln's First Annual Message to Congress, December 3, 1861.
- Re: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... Erik Reuter
- Re: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... Erik Reuter
- Re: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... Nick Arnett
- Re: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... Dan Minette
- RE: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Gummint programs and stats (was RE: Pre... J. van Baardwijk
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy John Garcia
- Who's the worst/best U.S. President (was: corruption...) Matt Grimaldi
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy Doug
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Corruption in a Democracy Kevin Tarr
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Corruption in a Democracy Kevin Tarr
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Corruption in a Democracy Kevin Tarr
- RE: Corruption in a Democracy Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Corruption in a Democracy Dan Minette
- Civil War Re: Corruption in a Democracy Doug
- Re: Civil War Re: Corruption in a Democracy John Garcia
