Dan Minette wrote:
>>
>>But tossing something from one hand to the other just isn't very
>>difficult under normal circumstances, so your contention that going
>>from 0 to 1 is a big difference doesn't follow.
>>
>>Man, I'll argue about anything tonight. 8^)
>>
>>
> YOU ARE MISQUOTING ME AGAIN. YOU YOU, CALIFORNIAN, YOU.
>
> What I wrote was
>
> My take on the matter is going from one child to two is going
> from juggling 1 ball to juggling 2 balls. From 2 -3 is going
> from 2 to 3 balls. The difference between 0 and 1 is gigantic.
> Between 1 and 2 is not as much. Between 2 and 3 is big again
>
> A careful reader would note that I only used the juggling metaphore when
> discussing 1 to 2 vs 2 to 3.
> Power prices are down. You can afford to turn on a light so you can
> actually _read_ your computer screen, Doug. :-)
>
Now how do I determine from your text the delineation between
juggling and child rearing.
huh, huh....
8^)
--
Doug
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.zo.com/~brighto
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the
fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first
existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the
higher consideration." A. Lincoln's First Annual Message to
Congress, December 3, 1861.
