----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: CNN Breaking News

Part of what I wrote got garbled.  It should be:

No, but they stated that the Palestinain Authority is responsible for
policing the Palestinians and is responsible for stopping the attacks.  They
also feel that the Palestinian authority is deliberately using a revolving
door policy with regards to terrorist: arrest them as part of a show of
concern and release them when the world's attention wavers.

> they felt that the Voice of Palestine was partially responsible for the
> deaths.  They also felt that the Voice of Palestine has continuously
> violated the Oslo accord for years.  Do you know why?
>
> I'm asking, not to be snide, but to get a feel for the extent of the
> information that's available for you.  Even if you think that it was wrong
> to blow up the radio station, it is worth noting why they felt it was
> justified.
>
>
> >
> > Again, it looks more like Israel used this as an excuse to continue its
> > "Silence the Palestinian Media" operation, rather than an attack on
> whoever
> > sent the terrorist.
>
> Their vantage point is that its the Palestianian Authority's
responsibility
> to stop the attacks.  They see  the Authority as deliberately looking the
> other way and allowing the attacks.  They will keep on retaliating against
> the infrastructure of the Authority for each attack until the Authority
gets
> the idea that it would be benificial to stop the attacks.
>
> Now, that may realistically never happen.  Arafat may not control the
> Palestinians because he is riding the tiger.  If that is true, I'm not
sure
> what will bring peace.  But, I don't think that anyone should be expected
to
> take repeated attacks at pizza parlors and bat mitzfas without responding.
> If I understand your suggestion, Israel should retreat to the 1967
> boundaries and hope to be left alone.  Do I misunderstand your ideas?
>
>
>
> Dan M.
>
>

Reply via email to