> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Dan Minette [snip] > I understand that. But, I'm starting to form a picture, and lets > see if it > make sense. Most servers have been workstations, and most of those > workstations have been Unix. When switching over to Intel Boxes, > the folks > selecting those boxes would want a comfort factor. Running a > flavor of Unix > would be that factor. Thus, the Linux market is those folks who've been > running Unix for years on workstation servers and want to continue to run > Unix for their PC servers. > > Do you see a flaw in this picture? I'm sure it's somewhat true, but turning to more subjective data... a lot of the people putting Linux servers into business have been the younger sysadmins and developers who are more comfortable with new things. If anything, the people who've been running Solaris, etc., tend to sneer at Linux the most. Nick
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Long) Erik Reuter
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down response to a long thre... Dan Minette
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down response to a long... Erik Reuter
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down response to a ... Dan Minette
- RE: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down response t... Nick Arnett
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Dan Minette
- RE: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Nick Arnett
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Dan Minette
- Linux, workstations, etc. (was RE: Win 98 ... Nick Arnett
- Re: Linux, workstations, etc. (was RE: Win... Dan Minette
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Nick Arnett
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Julia Thompson
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down response t... Erik Reuter
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Erik Reuter
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Dan Minette
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Dan Minette
- Re: Win 98 Registry (Shortened down respon... Erik Reuter
