Richard Baker wrote:
>The Fool said:
>
>>What kind of total crap is
?
>
>It's an XHTML tag. I think XHTML is definitely a good thing, but not
>in email.
I've been using this address for over five years, and this is the first complaints I've heard. In fact, I have no idea at all what you guys are talking about. Please enlighten me.
Jim
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for space flight.... Jim Sharkey
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for space fl... Erik Reuter
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for space fl... Jim Sharkey
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for spac... Erik Reuter
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for ... Richard Baker
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for space fl... Jim Sharkey
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for spac... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for ... Erik Reuter
- RE: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for space fl... Chad Cooper
- RE: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for spac... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: HTML? (was: Re: It's a sad, sad day for ... Erik Reuter
