> > For how this might be a wonderful
> > universe, see my
> >
> > http://cdr.sine.com/cdr/article.cfm?id=35
> >
Richard--
I like the article. I'm not sure it's really fair to say
one would get to see all of these great future events, though.
That's only true if one is on one of these high speed ships all
the time. I do think I'd like to run around on a planet now
and then! (By the way, how does one deal with the fact that
time at the two ends of a wormhole might (appear to) run at
different rates?)
>
> Stable Macroscopic Wormholes violate _causality_.
>
> Take, for example, two (mother) ships with relative speed v.
> Each one of them launches one wormhole, using two auxiliary
> ships for each of them [so I have a total of 6 ships;
> maybe I am needlessly multiplying entities :-)]. If the two
> wormholes stop at the same space point [relative to one
> of the two motherships], the two wormholes will be out
> of synchronism. So we have a time machine.
But Alberto, that's even better! Now I can see it all.
I just have to stay on the ships for awhile, until the Wormhole
Wranglers get the ends in the right places and set up the
Time Tunnel.
---David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GCU We don't need no stinkin' causality!
