----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:41 AM Subject: RE: Andrea Yates
> > > >Texas law does not allow juries to be informed of the > > potential results of > > >their decisions. IOW the jury was allowed to think that > > Yates would walk > > >free if found "Not Guilty Due To Insanity". In actuality she > > would likely > > >ok. But if you kill your kids (and who hasnt wanted to<G>) there must > > >secretly be a motive. > > > > > >Before you start correcting me, I'm just being "over the top". > > >I am really angry about this trial. > > > > Let me help you with this. If it was a husband who drowned the children, > then claimed insanity, it would have never been taken seriously, it may have > even been the death penalty. If it had been a black husband, it would have > been first degree murder with a sentence of the death penalty. Same crime, > yet different output depending on the perp. Are women the only sex allowed > to claim this sort of insanity? > > However, taking all of this aside - I am glad she got life. She will have > the rest of her life to remember how each of her children looked at her as > she was drowning them. > > > > > > > > What do you think would have been the best outcome of the trial? > > > > Give her twenty years to live with herself, then we drown her like a witch! > This does not sound so cruel as most death penalty inmates spend about that > much time in jail before being executed. > > Chad Cooper - who is really pissed off as well. > You are a cruel, hard, man Chad. xponent Sounds Like A Texan Maru rob
