----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: Civility request


> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:42:54PM -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
> > WADR, the flip side of that is tolerance of other's peoples' sensitivity
.
>
> Of course, that is really silly. If everyone spent all their time
> worrying about every little thing that might possibly cause someone,
> somewhere a slight instant of uneasiness, nothing would ever get said or
> done. Personally, I don't like people using acronyms like WADR, because
> it upsets me and makes me wonder if they are trying to make me feel dumb
> since I can't figure out what it means. But you don't see me complaining
> about it. Uh, wait, doh!
>
> P.S. Your misuse of apostrophes offends me. I believe it also indicates
> that you have lost the argument, since bad puncutation is obviously an
> indication of a loser.
>

Come on Eric.  f*** usually referrs to the forceable taking of someone
sexually.  It is not part of civil discorse for a reason.  If it is used in
civil discord, then it loses its meaning, and other words have to be added
to give the same meaning.

I saw your list of uses of the word, and I am honestly not very impressed.
Its like arguing the word "like" is so useful because it is used in phrases
"like for sure" and like I totally bombed that English test and like I like
him."  Use of a singular word in such a manner is typically does not
indicate an impressive command of the English language.

Dan M.

Dan M.

Reply via email to