On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 08:51:23PM -0500, Jim Sharkey wrote: > Perhaps that's not what you implied, but your vehement attitude over > it certainly spoke volumes.
Actually, if you read again, you will notice I didn't become "vehement" until you started repeatedly denying that there was anything you could do about it. The HTML wasn't a big deal; repeatedly saying that there was nothing you could do about it when it wasn't true was why I made a "vehement" reply. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
