----- Original Message ----- From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:16 PM Subject: Re: 'Virtual' Child Porn Act Ruled Unconstitutional
> Dan Minette wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:31 PM > > Subject: Re: 'Virtual' Child Porn Act Ruled Unconstitutional > > > > > << Do you have a cite on that? I hadn't heard about that. >> > > > > > > Nothing that I can recall. But Playboy has reported on it a few times. > > > > And, if that's not an unimpeachable source, what is? I mean Playboy would > > have nothing fake in it, would it. :-) > > Textually, maybe not. Images are a different matter altogether. ;) > > (If there are that many women with skin that's actually that perfect, I > *will* puke.) > Well, the one women I know who has been in Playboy has pretty nice skin. :-) But, I actually didn't see her Playboy pictures, and I really don't want to. I have a pleasant enough relationship with her, and I can't imagine keeping it after looking at "dirty pictures" of her. Dan M.
