I figured out how tobacco induces psychosis by increasing the level of 
neurotransmitter activity [I'm not a psychologist or psychologist, sue me] 
which enables the power of suggestion to take hold.  Your own thoughts then 
at some point divide your personality and you hear voices, not that I've 
heard voices, but my thoughts struck me as paranoia-like.  Power of 
suggestion can be any external stimuli such as radio, tv, the neighbors, some 
dude in a car reading off of a script into a megaphone, games, etc.  Then 
normal everyday surveillance is done to provide feedback to the delusions 
that form, whatever they may be.

The God stuff is true, since Intelligence is not equal to the detail of my 
mind.  Whether it's actually God or not is up to your judgement.  The 
circumstances are bizarre, therefore, I believe in God, the ideal that I've 
proven exists.

I have reason to suspect communique set three plus, but that remains 
unproven, unless y'all cannot affect the weather.  Go find out.

What else?  Oh, a very great percentage of what I've written is true, but 
lying in the artistic sense.  Some outright lies are quite obvious that I've 
made.

If you're wondering about Jesus and the resurrection:  Lazarus and a faction 
of the Roman government set up the followers of Jesus.  Jesus was a smart 
guy, made a deal with Judas and Pilate to kill him and disprove or prove that 
he is was God.  The next move for the Jews was to steal the body and claim 
resurrection, and have their moles destroy any writings made by Jesus.  That 
would mean Jesus' disciples were quite stupid.  I'm more comfortable with my 
original hypothesis that Jesus was a nice guy, stupid and uneducated, had 
good intentions, and God chose him for whatever reasons God had.  But at the 
very end, Jesus was a cheap-ass, and that damns him for eternity.

And I'll repeat what I believe.  God chose me to tell you all the stories 
I've told, constructed by educated guesses and experimentation and logical 
deduction.  That other people also chose me for the same reasons is 
incidental.  I would kill my son to save the good in the world, but since I 
have a choice to try to protect my son, I will not make the offer.  Thus the 
writers of the New Testament were not altogether stupid and cruel.

I just don't have enough information to tell which disciples were good and 
which were antagonistic.  I won't read the Bible to find that out, unless I 
have to, I find it a thoroughly corrupt work, only good for the paper it's 
printed on.  I have excellent reasons to believe the vast majority of you 
agree.

Mark

Reply via email to