I wrote, purely out of curiousity and love:
<<
Subject: Re: Numenorean beards?
From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ">[EMAIL PROTECTED] </A> (Mark 
Constantino)
Date: 5/19/02 8:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Yes, there's inbreeding between sub-species of homo sapiens.  And the
identifying trait is body hair.  Neanderthalensis had lots of body hair.

If you're implying that homo sapiens mutts are testing us purer homo sapiens
sapiens, then you're pulling the Thor Heyerdahl "gambit", as I predicted.

I've got some leg hair and more European-like features.  I'm part
neanderthalensis too.  Does it make sense to test a mutt on behalf of the 
purer
strains?  No, it's clear to me that people could not keep a secret before 
2000,
and therefore they 1) Did not know the strong proof of an ideal universe  2)
Had forgotten how to build the Egyptian pyramids.

What I'm suggesting is find two or more preserved parts of pure homo sapiens
neanderthalensis, creating male and female gametes from them, and then 
creating
zygotes to be implanted in a volunteer host.  The gestation periods should be
roughly the same, though we might want to choose a tall volunteer because homo
sapiens neanderthalensis was probably bigger than homo sapiens sapiens is, and
if not, it won't present a problem.  
>>

And now I suspect that this is the reason for all the anger!!!!!!  Either 
purer homo sapiens sapiens is revolted at the idea of someone carrying homo 
sapiens neanderthalensis to term, or the impure homo sapiens muttbuttsis is 
objecting because their ancestors were suspected of being raped by 
neanderthalensis!!!!  Dudes, the evidence points to the other way around, 
rape of neanderthalensis, no, that would mean that if the children were saved 
they could love halfbreeds and breed with them later.  So really what 
happened was that homo sapiens sapiens was raped or that consensual sex was 
obtained resulting in a halfbreed that was lovable and mateable by the 
individuals at that time.  Neanderthalensis was killed because of the 
suspicion of rape.  What's rape have to do with it?  It's just a second hand 
emotion!

That I'm empathic [in the emotional sense, not extrasensory sense] to the 
plight of an extinct species that we may save and teach tolerance and love 
and calculus makes me public enemy number one!!!!  What I'm describing is not 
cloning, oh yeah, it is, but clones of living people with the intent to 
"upload" the mind into the new clone are different.  Why?  Loueezus Christ!  
We're talking about the salvation of a sentient species!!!!!

I'm laughing my ass off, . . . dudes!

Reply via email to