At 07:15 AM 5/30/02, Tom Beck wrote:
><< Technically, it should be feasible. The paperwork to keep track of who
>owes how many minutes to whom would be humongous, though. >>
>
>
>But wouldn't it be possible with computers, wireless networks, and "smart
>cards" to do all that electronically? Granted, the programming to set up the
>system would be extensive - and the testing and debugging even more so - but
>it should be possible, in theory, to establish something that would seem
>transparent to users. Whether it would be economically viable to do so is
>another question.
>
>In the simplest iteration, you wouldn't owe minutes to any particular person.
>You'd contribute minutes to a big pot, in return for which you could withdraw
>minutes from the same pot. You would have to agree, though, that someone who
>put in minutes could call upon you for your minutes (subject to certain
>common-sense criteria; e.g., a person in Kuala Lumpur, no matter how many
>minutes he had contributed, could not demand equivalent minutes from someone
>in Rejkjavik).
>
>Although, if he did, that might make for the basis of an interesting science
>fiction short story...



And when your account balance drops to zero minutes, you are immediately 
euthanized . . .



-- Ronn! :)

God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
 From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam�
God bless America!
My home, sweet home.

-- Irving Berlin (1888-1989)

Reply via email to