>At 07:15 AM 5/30/02, Tom Beck wrote:
>><< Technically, it should be feasible. The paperwork to keep track of who
>>owes how many minutes to whom would be humongous, though. >>
>>
>>
>>But wouldn't it be possible with computers, wireless networks, and "smart
>>cards" to do all that electronically? Granted, the programming to set up 
>>the
>>system would be extensive - and the testing and debugging even more so - 
>>but
>>it should be possible, in theory, to establish something that would seem
>>transparent to users. Whether it would be economically viable to do so is
>>another question.
>>
>>In the simplest iteration, you wouldn't owe minutes to any particular 
>>person.
>>You'd contribute minutes to a big pot, in return for which you could 
>>withdraw
>>minutes from the same pot. You would have to agree, though, that someone 
>>who
>>put in minutes could call upon you for your minutes (subject to certain
>>common-sense criteria; e.g., a person in Kuala Lumpur, no matter how many
>>minutes he had contributed, could not demand equivalent minutes from 
>>someone
>>in Rejkjavik).
>>
>>Although, if he did, that might make for the basis of an interesting 
>>science
>>fiction short story...
>
Ronn wrote:
>And when your account balance drops to zero minutes, you are immediately 
>euthanized . . .

This is starting to sound like a cross between _Logan's Run_ and _Repent, 
Harlequin, Said the Tick-Tock Man_.

Reggie Bautista


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to