>Date: Sun,  2 Jun 2002 18:37:34 EDT
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: list BRIN-L: List Message Rejected
>
>Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>Your recent message to the BRIN-L list has been
>rejected for the following reason:
>
>Only list subscribers may send messages to this list.
>
>ListProc DID find the following alternate address for you:
>
>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>You may wish to retry your message from this address.
>
>If you need assistance, please contact the list owner at
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>The text of your message follows:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Received: from postoffice6.mail.cornell.edu 
>(postoffice6.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.21])
>       by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24064
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 
>18:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: (from daemon@localhost)
>       by postoffice6.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA11422
>       for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 18:37:25 
>-0400 (EDT)
>Received: from uclink4.berkeley.edu (uclink4.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.25.39])
>       by postoffice6.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11414
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 18:37:24 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from [10.0.1.2] (12-233-31-219.client.attbi.com [12.233.31.219])
>       by uclink4.berkeley.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g52MbBTE029565
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 15:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)
>Message-Id: <a05101009b9204c720369@[10.0.1.2]>
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 15:29:03 -0700
>X-PH: V4.1@postoffice6
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Bradford DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Citation of Chimpanzee documentary
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>
>>Rich said:
>>
>>>   I vote that we ban everyone who posts in HTML, everyone who complains
>>>   about HTML posting, everyone who is rabidly pro-America, pro-Europe,
>>>   pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian, all those who are too serious, everyone
>>>   who is facetious, all those who make content-free posts, anyone who
>>>   posts attachments, people who can't quote properly...
>>
>>I'm sorry, but this attitude stinks. I don't want to be part of such a
>>community. I'm going to unsubscribe, but first I want it widely known
>>that it's your fault and your fault alone.
>>
>>Rich
>>GCU You Should Be Ashamed Of Yourself
>
>And closed discourse loops! Anyone who initiates a closed discourse
>loop should be used for Tandu Target Practice...
>
>
>GCU This Cross-Universe Brin-Banks Leakage May Be Dangerous, Keptin

Reply via email to