> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: This is a troll.
>
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: maandag 3 juni 2002 6:23
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: Re: This is a troll.
>
> > > Mark is certainly mild by comparison, but that doesn't
> necessarily
> > > mean that the definition can't be applied to him. I have
> taken to
> > > the "just ignoring him" policy, but I had to reply to the
> idea that
> > > he can't see why one could call him a troll.
> > >
> > I understand Jim, but what makes a troll is intent.
>
> OK, so you apparently do not consider it trolling. Then what
> *do* you call it? Nobody else seems to be able to come up
> with an other term for what Mark is doing.
Spam?
Sophmoric artistic posturing?
-j-
