Well, thanx.
Perhaps "nicely" isn't the best word to describe the Danish team's effort. I
think "sub-average" is better. It's effort in this world cup was by no means
up to standard (although it got further than it's been able to on previous
occasions). Our team lacked aggresion and tecnique. Plain and simple.
In fact, I think the Danish team is the only one which has made it a
strategy to pass the ball backwards gradually all the way to the keeper, and
then hope that he can kick it further up than the rest of the team managed
to get it on their own.
*sigh*

Med venlig hilsen / Yours sincerely
M. Malmkvist / WWW.PowerCad.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pa vegne
af Julia Thompson
Sendt: 28. juni 2002 01:47
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: Game of the Century


"M. Malmkvist" wrote:
>
> Oh please...
> Don't use the "better looking"-argument. The Danish team was scorned by
both
> the English and the Japanese as being the ugliest team in the World Cup.
> In the English tabloid these arguments were backed up by pictures of
Danish
> players, taken at the precise moment they were screaming, etc., giving
them
> twisted and evil looks.
> Although the Brazilian team plays great soccer, I've been wondering that
> perhaps you have to have huge front teeth to play as Brazilian attacker...
> Aside from that, I hope Brazil wins, simply because they've been playing
so
> much better and interesting, whereas the German team has been save time
and
> again by their only really good player, the keeper.

Hey, I'm a heterosexual woman.  I'll make any argument in favor of the
"better-looking" guy teams that I like!  :)

(But they also played nicely, for the short amount that I saw them.)

        Julia

Reply via email to