At 08:55 07-07-2002 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote: >On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:51:40PM +0200, J. van Baardwijk wrote: > > > There is an awful lot of data about AmPat you are missing; > >What data am I missing? The way to prove me wrong would be to supply >that data. I contend I have enough data and that the analysis of >AmericanPatriot is right on.
Then present *all* the data and tell us for each data point to which part of your "analysis" it points. > > As he only sent four messages (and short ones at that), it is > > impossible for anyone to make a psycho-analysis of him > >A single case can disprove your claim of impossibility. And it is >possible for me, because I did it. For reasons given in earlier points, that was not a psycho-analysis. > > Your "analysis" shows that you really intended this to be an analysis > > of me, not of AmPat. > >Nope, it said it was intended it to be an analysis of AmericanPatriot. > > > The clearest evidence for this lies in the following phrase: > > > > > The threats and attempts to impose his own will upon others > > > > AmPat never threatened anyone nor attempted to impose his own will > > upon others. For the record, these are all the replies he sent: > >Nope, you didn't see any private emails that AmericanPatriot sent to >me. You lack sufficient data to make that statement. Again, post all the data, including those private e-mails. AmPat is not around, so he will not object. > > Nothing in AmPat's posts gives any indication of that. > >Oh, but you are not looking closely enough! I saw it clearly! Maybe you >need to improve your skills? Then prove me wrong by making a very detailed analysis of his posts. Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
